<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IT@Intel: Return on Security Investment</title>
	<link>http://www.podtech.net/home/4317/itintel-return-on-security-investment</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: best techno blogs &#187; IT@Intel: Return on Security Investment</title>
		<link>http://www.podtech.net/home/4317/itintel-return-on-security-investment#comment-211695</link>
		<dc:creator>best techno blogs &#187; IT@Intel: Return on Security Investment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 05:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.podtech.net/home/4317/itintel-return-on-security-investment#comment-211695</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt Rosenquist, Information Security Strategist at Intel, says that measuring success in the security industry is difficult, since there isn&#8217;t a perfect tool for measuring what doesn&#8217;t happen. In this podcas talks about how he approaches a nascent practice like security. Rosenquist blogs about security for IT@Intel, where in a recent post he posited some reasons why virtualization remains a open &#8212; and important &#8212; question for security professionals. In his post, Rosenquist argues that, since &#8230; Original Post PodTech.net: Technology and Entertainment Video Network [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Matt Rosenquist, Information Security Strategist at Intel, says that measuring success in the security industry is difficult, since there isn&#8217;t a perfect tool for measuring what doesn&#8217;t happen. In this podcas talks about how he approaches a nascent practice like security. Rosenquist blogs about security for <a href="mailto:IT@Intel">IT@Intel</a>, where in a recent post he posited some reasons why virtualization remains a open &#8212; and important &#8212; question for security professionals. In his post, Rosenquist argues that, since &#8230; Original Post PodTech.net: Technology and Entertainment Video Network [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romtej.Com &#187; IT@Intel: Return on Security Investment</title>
		<link>http://www.podtech.net/home/4317/itintel-return-on-security-investment#comment-211671</link>
		<dc:creator>Romtej.Com &#187; IT@Intel: Return on Security Investment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 03:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.podtech.net/home/4317/itintel-return-on-security-investment#comment-211671</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Morrison wrote an interesting post today on IT@Intel: Return on Security InvestmentHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Chris Morrison wrote an interesting post today on <a href="mailto:IT@Intel:">IT@Intel:</a> Return on Security InvestmentHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
