<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forbes Stands Firm Against Network Neutrality</title>
	<link>http://www.podtech.net/home/788/forbes-stands-firm-against-network-neutrality</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Guffey</title>
		<link>http://www.podtech.net/home/788/forbes-stands-firm-against-network-neutrality#comment-3678</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Guffey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 06:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.podtech.net/home/788/forbes-stands-firm-against-network-neutrality#comment-3678</guid>
		<description>Steve's comments were not baseless, but do not include the whole truth. He says that there is no action needing a reaction (Net Neutrality). The action took place when the Supreme Court made its ruling, changing the alleged role of ISPs. A reaction is definitely needed. Furthermore, "Net Neutrality" is not a regulation inasmuch as it is a mandate of "nonregulation". The public would agree that the internet is a world of opportunity that should not be landscaped, influenced, or directed by the few (ISPs) but should evolve naturally in accordance with the demands of its users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve&#8217;s comments were not baseless, but do not include the whole truth. He says that there is no action needing a reaction (Net Neutrality). The action took place when the Supreme Court made its ruling, changing the alleged role of ISPs. A reaction is definitely needed. Furthermore, &#8220;Net Neutrality&#8221; is not a regulation inasmuch as it is a mandate of &#8220;nonregulation&#8221;. The public would agree that the internet is a world of opportunity that should not be landscaped, influenced, or directed by the few (ISPs) but should evolve naturally in accordance with the demands of its users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Wilhelm</title>
		<link>http://www.podtech.net/home/788/forbes-stands-firm-against-network-neutrality#comment-3614</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wilhelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 06:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.podtech.net/home/788/forbes-stands-firm-against-network-neutrality#comment-3614</guid>
		<description>Or this video by Tim Berners-Lee:
http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/144</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or this video by Tim Berners-Lee:<br />
<a href="http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/144" rel="nofollow">http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/144</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scoble</title>
		<link>http://www.podtech.net/home/788/forbes-stands-firm-against-network-neutrality#comment-3611</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Scoble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 03:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.podtech.net/home/788/forbes-stands-firm-against-network-neutrality#comment-3611</guid>
		<description>Steve needs to watch last week's Rocketboom: http://www.rocketboom.com/vlog/archives/2006/06/rb_06_jun_23.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve needs to watch last week&#8217;s Rocketboom: <a href="http://www.rocketboom.com/vlog/archives/2006/06/rb_06_jun_23.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rocketboom.com/vlog/archives/2006/06/rb_06_jun_23.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

