<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Social with BEA</title>
	<link>http://www.podtech.net/scobleshow/technology/1529/getting-social-with-bea</link>
	<description>Who are you?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: en.terpri.se &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Slanguage Creep</title>
		<link>http://www.podtech.net/scobleshow/technology/1529/getting-social-with-bea#comment-97257</link>
		<dc:creator>en.terpri.se &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Slanguage Creep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.podtech.net/scobleshow/technology/1529/getting-social-with-bea#comment-97257</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the more annoying aspects of Web 2.0, etc., is the injection of neologisms, protologisms, or just plan made up words. In fact, I do not think that I have heard a talk from my friends Jay Simons or David Meyer in the last year that has not included a protologism. (I like the word protologism better, since it indicates something not quite finished, completed, or even valid). This include words like &#8220;folksonomy&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] One of the more annoying aspects of Web 2.0, etc., is the injection of neologisms, protologisms, or just plan made up words. In fact, I do not think that I have heard a talk from my friends Jay Simons or David Meyer in the last year that has not included a protologism. (I like the word protologism better, since it indicates something not quite finished, completed, or even valid). This include words like &#8220;folksonomy&#8221;. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
